16 Responses to “What’s your opinion on the Adam Lambert saga / drama?”

1. Todd says:

   July 12 at 08:01

   Attention whore.
2. Trevor says:

   July 12 at 08:46

   Kissing another guy wasn’t an issue for most of the networks but it was the simulated oral copulation. The fact that you pair the word *gay* with *antics* is homophobic.

   I personally think everyone is seeing him as new and innovative whereas Jagger, Bowie, Boy George, Elton John, Sylvester etc have all been down this route thirty/forty years ago – the list is endless.

   Has America flipped a switch and gone back in time because everyone is so easily outraged by issues of sexuality and this has been going on for five decades – everyone in Europe is *over it* now – time to catch up USA!

   America is so vanilla and puritanical – it’s weird.

   BRILLA:
   MADONNA had a man simulate oral copulation under her ballgown on prime time TV in the early 80s – in the first and subsequent showing of her Vogue/Material Girl TV appearance when she and her dancers/cast were dressed in restoration outfits.
   She did a lot more besides, during the first half of her career.

   BRILLA if people *had an innate disgust towards homosexuality* as you assert do you really think Adam Lambert who is at a critical cusp in his career would have thrown it into his act? Of course not – he is speaking to the newer generations who at the moment find gayness intriguing and in ten years it will be the norm and no-one will bat an eyelid – as the old dinosaurs all slowly die off and leave the world to the enlightened and educated.

   TRUTHSEEKER: actually Adam Lambert is one of your kind: bisexual
3. $0.02 RETURNS says:

   July 12 at 08:49

   I find it surprising that anyone actually watches Entertainment networks.

   Well, maybe more disappointing than surprising.

   I had to look up the incident because I had no clue what you were talking about. So a man kisses another man, who the hell cares?
4. Rembrandt says:

   July 12 at 09:42

   I haven’t seen a crapfight like this since we saw Janet Jackson’s booby for 1/2 a second during the Super Bowl.

   Is america f***ed-up about sex, or what?
5. Brilla says:

   July 12 at 09:57

   I think that the women being overly sexual and ‘s l u t t y” for lack of a better term is also inappropriate. If they had such great talent, why would they need to resort to using sex to sell their performace?

   However, Adam’s performance was over the line because he simulated oral sex….smashing a guy’s face into his crotch. I have NEVER seen a female performer smash a man’s face into her croth on stage. He had mn on leashes with their buttocks showing, simulating domination. I don’t think it’s healthy to think that putting someone on a leash for sexual pleasure is normal.

   Also, he made out with aguy on stage. I would also disapprove of a female making out with a woman on stage….but I feel that the gay antics are even worse because most people have an innate disgust towards male homosexuality . Male-female kissing is natural so althogh it is in extreme poor taste and inappropriate, it’s not going to make most people want to puke.

   Adam’s performance seriously grossed me out.
6. Zahavah says:

   July 12 at 10:04

   You know I hate slutty males as much as I hate slutty females
7. Eloka D says:

   July 12 at 10:13

   I see men being able to just walk down the street with nothing but shorts on and this is ok, for me I am a whore if I wear my bikini top. I see old men wearing nothing but tiny shorts and they constantly play with themselves.

   Men are allowed to do this, if women do it must be because they are whores or it is their job. I see men pissing whereever they want and getting away with it, I see men stand there with no clothes and people laugh. A woman does it, it MUST BE SEXUAL! It sucks for both sides, especially when you can see both sides. It’s funny for men, women are whores…. got it.
8. Truthseeker says:

   July 12 at 10:19

   I didn’t know who he was– I just watched an “Entertainment Tonight” interview with him about the Music awards incident– and all I have to say is, “Wow, he’s a total flamer.”
9. Know It All says:

   July 12 at 11:16

   Well, sex sells. There’s still a double standard where women can “sacrifice” themselves on the couch and become VPs, while men can’t. What’s up with THAT double standard?
10. RoVale says:

    July 12 at 11:51

    He’s just another flamboyant gay performer along the lines of Boy George, Elton John, LIberace, and Little Richard. It’s rather unfortunate that he chose to do his performance this way but it did get him attention and people are still talking about it today.
11. Spiraled Out says:

    July 12 at 12:34

    To be perfectly honest, what entertainers do or don’t do has literally ZERO effect on my life. I’m not influenced by people who can sing and dance. Not my thing, and I pay it no mind.

    And I agree with the other poster who said “who watches Entertainment networks” I think it is sad commentary how much time people waste watching shows like Dancing with the Stars and AMerican Idol…..I would suspect they have a severe lack of prioroties in life
12. Out With A Bang says:

    July 12 at 13:29

    i agree with adam lambert, kind of a double standard

    i never see any of that eloka d
13. Blue-Eyed Christian says:

    July 12 at 13:53

    I wish everyone, straight or gay, would keep overt sexual antics off the stage and in the bedroom where they belong. It’s sad that modern “artists” are so desperate for fame and fortune that, instead of relying solely on the strength of their talent, they make their performances as sexual as possible and focus on titillating the audience. Even sadder is that the audience is so jaded and stupid that the only thing that will hold their attention is a mock-orgy. Forget the song, forget the message, forget the quality of the singer’s voice, if there’s no partial nudity and no gyrating, they’re booooored. It’s so stupid. There is so much more to life than sex.
14. Ashley D says:

    July 12 at 14:15

    i really dont care that he is gay. like, that doesnt bother me one bit

    and honestly, if his whole performance was on HBO or something, i wouldnt have cared what was in it.

    i dont even care about the kiss.

    but to be simulating sex acts? not so much. like, there is no way that could have been confused as anything BUT a sex act. national tv has many veiwers, not all of them want to see that
15. The Lorax says:

    July 12 at 15:05

    From what I hear it was a good distraction from his poor singing that night.

    I have no opinion on this as I do not like my musicians who base themselves more on their image than their skills.
16. Roger says:

    July 12 at 15:05

    Sounds like his ratings are dropping and his “agents” told him to be “contraversial” to get the ratings/publicity back up.